On 24/08/2012 22:01, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote:
El 24/08/12 14:45, Thomas Harding escribió:
On 24/08/2012 17:32, Quiliro Ordóñez wrote:
Please read this:
http://libreplanet.org/wiki/LibrePlanet:About
LibrePlanet is an event organized by FSF. libreplanet.net is owned by
the FSF. The code of conduct at libreplanet.org is defined by the FSF.
One more time, /You wrong in your interpretation/, see below -- that
time explicitly, I will not insist a third :)
[URI] : /Red/, /understood/ -> my way, ever, is Free as Freedom
[URI::Quote]
This is the FSF Support Group Website for LibrePlanet. It is a pilot
project to investigate the tools and support a group needs to operate
proactively and also co-ordinate public awareness campaigns.
[....]
Our prime function is to support existing groups in creating new ones.
Ideally, we would like every member to start their own group. New
groups are added to the group network forming group families. We
recognize each group has unique needs and skills, so our goal is to
provide a uniform operation framework that does not interfere with the
group's unique requirements.
[....]
Our second function is to provide educational material for creating
and operating a group. Research in this area is ongoing and depends on
members providing insightful feedback.
[...]
Our third function is to provide member support through guidelines in
conflict resolution, crisis management, and leadership.[...]
[/URI::Quote]
On /your/ post: I think even inside the FSF twelve employees[1]
circle there are xxxions, contradictions and disagrees on one point
or over, we have pleasant words on the net about /Free Software
guru/ R. M. Stallman, himself laughing about that on a portrait with
an old-time large hard disk plate. But this hopefully has nothing to
do with a religious sect :)
On that post top, you would see in headers the word Subject, with
for [topic] a second interesting word following [libreplanet-,
meaning we can xxx] /about/ Free Sowtware, but more xxx] /on/.
I will never agree any constraint on what me nor anyone would do
with our computers, including having proprietary software/os on her
computer, even in my family:
In other words: please let anyone on her free will, simply help them
your better to left their settlement /without falling yourself in
another one, which will never be elsewhere than inside yourself [1]/.
[snip: how I do personnaly with others, how I'm impaired in using
Free software]
I'm afraid the xxx-offending-word could be censored on that thread,
so please replace....
I don't see how your post addresses my concerns but just as a side
issue.
I thought we are all concerned here by (what) Free Software (is).
That post didn't addressed your concerns but your conduct on this list
and your wrongs in reading, so I answered:
* firstly with humor (maybe I'd better to explain, as parallel, what
I saw in Cambodia I worked in together with UN for 6 months in 1993 --
20 years /after/ "Red Khmers" have left but were still active, among
other war long term problems such as "Orange Agent" diseases)[2][3],
* secondly with samples on a hard and long way but non-authoritarian
(help with Free Software until the person want to switch on),
* and last what are the (next ?) threats against Free Software /we
have to [strike]fight[/strike] defeat/.
HTH,
TSFH
--------------
[1] only regarding *your post I quoted first*, your person have
obviously nothing to do with that comment!
[2]
(a) This is politic. This is /true/ politic. Free Software /is/
politic (Greek::polis:= "the" city),
(b) this /politic has obviously to do with computing/ as computing is
for era(s) the main /means/ in economy, bank (fund exchange, account),
plans, statistic, personal data (incl. property, official identity
data -- and their privacy, notably regarding politic, sexual
orientation, religion and ethnicity, the four having nothing to do in
especially in case of crisis times which could happen[d]),
communication (incl. diplomacy -- simply see WikiLeaks affairs), ...,
(c) Please never left politic turn into war, as diplomacy is far
better even if not in a short term view
(d) hopefully we have in France a strong law against that kind of
files, despite the weak of means given to survey organism.
[3]
(a) what gives misreadings, from a valuable 19th century political
theory to 20th century dictatorship states, massacres, disasters,
displacement, genocide, Gulag, wars ..., which in fact has not
disappeared totally.
(b) what also gives abroad interventionism and legitimate governments
destruction which allowed that to happen,
(c) if you don't find the parallel, this is your problem