[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Open Knowledge Policies: Science in EU

From: Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Open Knowledge Policies: Science in EU
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:36:57 -0300

Hello Pen-Yuan!

Em Fri, 16 Oct 2015 17:16:19 +0100
Pen-Yuan Hsing <> escreveu:

> On 16/10/15 16:32, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro wrote:
> > Hello Andrés!
> >
> > Em Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:54:31 +0100
> > Andrés Muñiz Piniella <> escreveu:
> >
> >> Next week there is a symposium that will be held in Viena
> >> registration seems to be still open [2] to discuss policies on open
> >> knowledge.
> >
> > Just want to point out the related RMS' article:
> >
> >
> Thanks Bruno, great article!
> Two quick questions about the article:
> (1) In it it said: "The cost of editing for a typical paper is
> between 1 percent and 3 percent of the cost of funding the research
> to produce it." -> Is there a source for this statement? I'd love to
> see it. Because I can use the actual data to talk to others about
> this problem.
> (2) It also said: "the word "open" had the last laugh: influential 
> campaigners for "open access" subsequently dropped freedom to 
> redistribute from their goals." -> Is there a current, standard 
> definition of "open access"? Does someone have a link? Sounds like
> the current "open access" is like "open source", if so is there an 
> equivalent term that's like Free Software?

I can't answer you precisely, so I'm Bcc'ing RMS.

 88888  FFFFF Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro (oitofelix) [0x28D618AF]
 8   8  F
 88888  FFFF
 8   8  F     irc://
 88888  F     xmpp://

- GNU ccd2cue maintainer
- GNU Savannah hacker
- GNU webmaster
- GNU web translation team coordinator (Brazilian Portuguese)
- GNU audio and video maintainer
- DMOZ free software editor (Portuguese)
- UFU FAMAT PET member
- SDF Public Access UNIX System ARPA member
- Riseup user and supporter

Please, support my work:

[GNU DISCLAIMER] I'm a GNU hacker, but my views don't necessarily
match those of the GNU project.  Hereby I express my own opinion,
style and perception, in good faith, aiming the betterment of GNU.

Attachment: pgp6e4pafMRRP.pgp
Description: Assinatura digital OpenPGP

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]