[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] C.H.I.P. $9 computer respects your freedom, wh

From: Michael Lamb
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] C.H.I.P. $9 computer respects your freedom, when you don't need GPU/Video/etc., perhaps
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:20:09 -0500

> > This is common, and is even worse for the other single-board computer
> ??? ... I think that CHIP is not worse than that.

I'm sorry, my phrasing was unclear. I meant: CHIP is flawed, and being
flawed is common. For example, the more-popular Raspberry Pi is worse
than CHIP, because it can't even boot without binary blobs. You and I
both agree with the statements on the FSF page.

> I think that the FSF page is relevant for CHIP (as of today).  CHIP
> would not be acceptable (from the viewpoint of freedom-respecting
> computer) when you want to use its GPU and video encoder/decoder with
> full features.

I agree. I hoped that the social media person's statements contrary to
the FSF page meant that the design had changed and the CHIP is now
freedom-respecting. But from the replies here and the lack of reply
from them, I doubt this is the case.

> When we don't use GPU and video, a board with Allwinner SoC could be a
> good computer.  So, it depends if it's serious flaw or not.

I expect it will remain "seriously flawed" due to the WiFi/GPU/VPU
blobs. But maybe a "seriously flawed" but still-usable computer for
only $9 is still a good thing for many people.

I hope that low price will make it effortless to introduce children
and students to general-purpose computing with free software.
Especially children, whom parents might discourage from using the
expensive family computer (or installing free software on it) for fear
they might "break" it.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]