Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

[coadde]

On 06/15/2016 04:23 AM, André Silva wrote:
> On 06/15/2016 03:15 AM, André Silva wrote:
>> On 06/15/2016 02:57 AM, coadde wrote:
>>> Now, see my new proposal below with the new changes about invariant
>>> sections, what do you think?
>>
>> +1, however i think we could add another detail in the exception part in
>> clause 2 to mean "cover texts" as another exception, eg:
>>
>> 2.  **Parabola is Free Culture**: All documentation and cultural works
>>     included in products of the Parabola project are [Free
>> Culture](http://freedomdefined.org/Definition),
>>     with the exceptions of: [licenses for works stating a
>> viewpoint](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicenses),
>>     [invariant
>> sections](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto-opt#SEC1) and
>>     [cover texts](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto-opt#SEC2).
>>     All documentation and cultural works created by or for Parabola are
>>     Free Culture, with no exceptions.
> 
> I forgot add my suggestion about adhocracy with some changes for clause 4 :P
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 4.  **Parabola and its community**: Parabola's community is [democratic
>     in its essence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_democracy)
> and [adhocratic](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adhocracy) as form of
> organization,
>     so the community is to be included whenever there is a need to make
>     a decision.
>     We encourage community participation in the development of the
>     project.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Adding "adhocracy" as form of organization clarify how works the
> development of the project to encourage community participation. ;)
> 
> What do you think guys?

+1

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature