[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: “should have had a warning / apology”

From: Dmitry Alexandrov
Subject: Re: “should have had a warning / apology”
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 20:13:13 +0300
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Aaron Wolf <> wrote:
> On 2019-10-12 3:20 a.m., Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>> Aaron Wolf <> wrote:
>>> MBR posted a Facebook link (which should have had a warning/apology perhaps)
>> I beg my pardon?  Warning of / apology for what?
> Just like "sorry for Facebook link" or something (because Facebook is a 
> company that works against most of the values we care about here).

Well, a good half of the Internet work against or at least contributes 
something against freedom of computing.  I do not think that _we_ have to 
apologize for them.

> I checked just now that this particular link is visible publicly without 
> JavaScript though, so I guess it's not too bad, relatively speaking.

Basically, it is not bad at all. :-)

But do you mean, that Facebook have other pages that are not readable without 
running nonfree scripts?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]