[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Carefully written essay asking for proportionality for rms
From: |
Miroslav Rovis |
Subject: |
Re: Carefully written essay asking for proportionality for rms |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:41:51 +0200 |
On 210421-08:39-0300, Jorge P. de Morais Neto wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Em [2021-04-20 ter 21:23:03+0200], Miroslav Rovis escreveu:
>
> > It wasn't much search:
> >
> > https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20210326.120708.aaaed337.en.html
>
> Interesting. And if you are subscribed, you might want to publicize
> stallmansupport.org there. It is a more comprehensive effort (and it
> links to my essay).
I'm inactive on the list. Not sure I can do much.
> > And it would take me time. But it does not show well in Pale Moon.
>
> How about if you disable CSS for the article? Maybe then it shows well
> on Pale Moon.
Not the article:
https://jorgemorais.gitlab.io/justice-for-rms/
I have issues with, but the gitlab repo:
https://gitlab.com/jorgemorais/justice-for-rms
, in Pale Moon (still, just checked again).
>
> > BTW, I sent you another email because what I replied is not on:
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2021-04/index.html
> > They do seem to be censoring, or clumsily deleting mail by accident...
> > This email of yours that I am replying to, and it's some 30 hours old,
> > is not there either... Why?
>
> I have no idea. I have just reported the problem to sysadmin@gnu.org in
> an email message CC’ed to you.
Finally emails might be back to appear, any difficulty in moderation management
hopefully surpassed.
>
> > In case the conversation is to be soon concluded: It has been a
> > pleasure to converse with you! Maybe we meet again on the net. (But
> > I'm still open if there's any more to discuss!)
>
> Its my pleasure. Do you use free instant messaging technologies so we
> can chat? I use XMPP and Matrix. I will send you my usernames via a
> private message.
Received that message. Will act.
> God bless!
>
> --
> - <https://stallmansupport.org> "In Support of Richard Stallman"
I was stuck with this for a while, in you signature:
> - <https://www.defectivebydesign.org>
E.g. I didn't figure out on my own that:
https://www.defectivebydesign.org/w3c
was the worst offender. But it sounds just right. They are.
Regards!
--
Miroslav Rovis
Zagreb, Croatia
https://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr
my PGP-key:
https://www.croatiafidelis.hr/FCF13245ED247DCE443855B7EA9884884FBAF0AE.asc
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature