[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wrt to Tru64

Subject: Re: Wrt to Tru64
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 04:22:11 -0000

Hi ,

I downloaded file again through the cvs web interface . But for me ${Wl} is still there and it comes . I am just attaching the part of the file below . so it will be easy to figure out where the patch actually goes . BTW i took the multilanguage branch .

       # Rational C++ 2.4.1
       # FIXME: insert proper C++ library support
       allow_undefined_flag=' ${wl}-expect_unresolved ${wl}\*'
archive_cmds='$CC -shared${allow_undefined_flag} $predep_objects $libobjs $deplibs $postdep_objects $compiler_flags ${wl}-soname $soname `test -n "$verstring" && echo ${wl}-set_version $verstring` -update_registry ${objdir}/so_locations -o $lib'

THE PATCH ACTUALLY GOES HERE   See the line below it sill have ${wl}

       hardcode_libdir_flag_spec='${wl}-rpath ${wl}$libdir'

       # Commands to make compiler produce verbose output that lists
       # what "hidden" libraries, object files and flags are used when
       # linking a shared library.
       # There doesn't appear to be a way to prevent this compiler from
       # explicitly linking system object files so we need to strip them
       # from the output so that they don't get included in the library
       # dependencies.
output_verbose_link_cmds='templist=`$CC -shared $CFLAGS -v conftest.$objext 2>&1 | grep "ld" | grep -v "ld:"`; templist=`echo $templist | sed "s/\(^.*ld.*\)\( .*ld.*$\)/\1/"`; list=""; for z in $templist; do case $z in conftest.$objext) list="$list $z";; *.$objext);; *) list="$list $z";;esac; done; echo $list'


From: Alexandre Oliva <address@hidden>
To: "ANEESH KUMAR .K.V" <address@hidden>
CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
Subject: Re: Wrt to Tru64
Date: 16 Mar 2001 02:42:39 -0300

On Mar 16, 2001, "ANEESH KUMAR .K.V" <address@hidden> wrote:

>   Right now i am having some problem with cvs . I am not able to check
> out the project so i am sending the  patch i created only by
> downloading the file .  I am sorry that i didn't do a cvs
> diff

That's not a problem.  But it's very hard to install a line-wrapped
patch.  Besides, the line numbers don't match at all.

It should be modifying the cxx entry for osf4 and 5, right?
${wl} has already been removed from hardcode_libdir_flag_spec in that
chunk of code.  Please double-check your patch.

Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see
Red Hat GCC Developer                  address@hidden,}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        address@hidden,}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]