libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: HP-UX 11.00 and parsing /bin/nm -p output (failing)


From: libtool-patches
Subject: Re: HP-UX 11.00 and parsing /bin/nm -p output (failing)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:09:02 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.1.12i

On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 06:31:54PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On Monday 23 April 2001  9:35 pm, address@hidden wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:28:52PM -0500, 
> address@hidden wrote:
> > > Patch below.
> >
> > Oops, forgot ChangeLog entry:
> >
> > 2001-04-23 Albert Chin-A-Young <address@hidden>
> >
> >     * libtool.m4: Handle case where /bin/nm -p outputs multiple
> >       symbol types (like under HP-UX 11.00).
> 
> No go on this one I am afraid.  The principle seems sound, but it causes test 
> failures on my linux box:
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.914 2001/04/24 17:13:00)
> ----------------------------------------------------


> checking for gcc... gcc
> checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) works... yes
> checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) is a cross-compiler... no
> checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
> checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
> checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
> checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
> 
> FAIL: demo-make.test
> FAIL: demo-exec.test
> FAIL: demo-inst.test
> FAIL: mdemo-make.test                                                         
> FAIL: demo-make.test
> FAIL: demo-exec.test
> FAIL: demo-inst.test
> FAIL: mdemo-make.test                                                         
> FAIL: dryrun.test
> FAIL: demo-make.test
> FAIL: demo-exec.test
> FAIL: demo-inst.test
> FAIL: demo-make.test
> FAIL: demo-exec.test
> FAIL: demo-make.test
> FAIL: demo-exec.test
> FAIL: demo-make.test
> FAIL: demo-exec.test
> FAIL: demo-inst.test
> FAIL: mdemo-make.test                                                         
> =====================
> 20 of 74 tests failed
> =====================
> 
> If I have time to figure out how to do it without causing failures on a 
> non-HP box before the release, I'll apply that instead of yours.

I just tried a Linux box here:
  $ uname -a
  Linux songoku 2.2.18
  $ gcc --version
  2.95.2
  $ nm --version
  GNU nm 2.9.5

and all tests passed.

-- 
albert chin (address@hidden)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]