Re: last minute fixes

[Thomas Tanner]

Hi

On 27-Apr-2001 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> Hmm.  Isn't that equivalent to commiting the current contents of the
>> MLB into HEAD?
> Yep.  Isn't that exactly what we want to do in order to eventually
> terminate the branch?

 IMO overwriting HEAD with MLB (which is still not up-to-date with HEAD)
 is not The Right Way (tm) to merge both branches because we loose a lot of
 new code which is only in HEAD.
 I think we should either merge new code (including the ltconfig removal)
 from HEAD to MLB while keeping HEAD in deep-freeze or
 do it the other way around, which is probably easier and would
 allow us to apply new patches to HEAD while keeping MLB in deep-freeze.

Thomas Tanner -------------------------
email: tanner@(ffii.org|gnu.org|gmx.de)
web:   http://home.pages.de/~tanner
UMI:   http://umi.ffii.org