Re: [PATCH] remove dead code from AC_DEPLIBS_CHECK_METHOD

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 16:00, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
>
> > Scott James Remnant wrote:
> >
> > > A good rule of thumb is probably therefore if an arch goes for more than
> > > 6 months, or one significant release without getting the change to
> > > pass_all backed out again then the dead code can be removed.
> >
> > > It changes no functionality, these architectures have been using
> > > pass_all for some time.
> >
> > lt_cv_file_magic_test_file is only used when lt_cvs_deplibs_check_method is 
> > file_magic, so you can prune more aggressively.
>
> I was fairly sure this was the case, but found one or two where the
> assignment of lt_cv_file_magic_test_file had been left even though
> lt_cv_deplibs_check_method had been set to pass_all; "solaris*" springs
> to 
>
> Erring on the side of caution seemed a better bet for the first try.
>
>
> > I agree to remove the stuff that was already pass_all for libtool-1-5 if you
> > resubmit with the extra tidying.
>
> Attached.

Thanks!  Applied to HEAD.  Sorry for the delay.

Cheers,
        Gary.
--
  ())_.  Gary V. Vaughan    gary@(lilith.warpmail.net|gnu.org)
  ( '/   Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk       ,_())____
  / )=   GNU Hacker         http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool  \'      `&
`(_~)_   Tech' Author       http://sources.redhat.com/autobook   =`---d__/