[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 286-gary-libtoolize-recursive-ltdl.diff

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: 286-gary-libtoolize-recursive-ltdl.diff
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:23:44 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Hi Gary,

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:55:05PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I have a couple of gripes with it:
> > - First, LTCOMPILE is not published interface by Automake,
> > - Second, you kill dependency tracking for the LTLIBOBJS,
> >
> > Considering this, maybe this is too high a price to pay for gaining
> > unchanged AM_CPPFLAGS, DEFS, and AM_LDFLAGS.  What do you think?
> > Sorry for not thinking enough about this before, but now that I see
> > this, I believe it needs to be addressed.
> I wavered on this myself for a while, and on balance, I think you're
> right: we need hackish workarounds to make it work properly.  I've
> reverted to using AM_CPPFLAGS and AM_LDFLAGS.

OK to apply after changing the libtool.texi part to also reflect this.

> > Could you please repost the patch without format=flowed, so I can apply
> > it cleanly.  Thank you.  I'm seeing weirdnesses with libtoolize but want
> > to make sure they are not from me messing up the merge.
> Reredone here.  I also posted a patch to fix your weirdness (well, not
> literally *yours*, but you know what I mean!) in that thread.

OK.  Thank you, for all of this work, and sorry for the latency.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]