[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: several AIX questions
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: several AIX questions |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:59:31 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 08:08:50PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> 1) This patch from HEAD:
> | 2004-09-26 Albert Chin-A-Young <address@hidden>
> |
> | * m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LINKER_SHLIBS) [aix]: In archive_expsym_cmds,
> | move -bnoentry linker option before $compiler_flags to honor any
> | possible -e entries in LDFLAGS.
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-09/msg00321.html
>
> has been applied to the C case only (and not backported to branch-1-5).
> Should it not be for C++ as well? What's the reason for it anyway?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-04/msg00085.html
Yes, it should be applied to C++ as well.
> Also, should it not also be applied to the ia64 case?
Dunno. Don't have access to AIX/IA.
> 3) This thing has me stunned (non-rtl case): mdemo-exec on *uninstalled*
> modules works, whereas on *installed* ones it fails; reason: we don't
> install the .so files. We
> ar cru libfoo.a libfoo.so.0
> and then install libfoo.a only. What's the right way to fix this?
> Install libfoo.so.0 as well? Is there maybe some root-only trickery
> necessary so that the installed .so file isn't necessary (I think not)?
Won't the above insert a copy of libfoo.so.0 into libfoo.a? If
mdemo-exec isn't linked with -brtl, why wouldn't it find libfoo.a?
--
albert chin (address@hidden)