Re: libtool / C++ / inter library dependencies

[Ossama Othman]

Hi Michael,

On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:33:42AM +0200, Michael Forster wrote:
> libb.so depends on liba.so.
> 
> Is this possible with any libtool/automake/autoconf version?

Sure.

> I tried without success:
> 
> ======================================== Makefile.am
> 
> lib_LTLIBRARIES = liba.la libb.la
> 
> liba_la_SOURCES = a.cpp
> 
> libb_la_SOURCES = b.cpp
> libb_la_LIBADD = liba.la
> 
> ========================================
> 
> [BTW: which combination of "LIBADD" / "LDADD" / "LDFLAGS" and "liba.la" /
> "-la" should I use?]
> 
> Result:
> 
> - ->ldd libb.so
>         liba.so.0 =>     ./liba.so.0
>         libstdc++.so.2.10.0 =>   (file not found)
>         libm.so.1 =>     /usr/lib/libm.so.1
>         libc.so.1 =>     /usr/lib/libc.so.1
>         libstdc++.so.2.10.0 =>  
> /public/packages/programming/gcc-2.95.2/lib/libstdc++.so.2.10.0
>         libdl.so.1 =>    /usr/lib/libdl.so.1
>         /usr/platform/SUNW,Ultra-250/lib/libc_psr.so.1
> 
> Please note the second line.

Maybe I'm missing something but isn't that exactly what you wanted,
i.e. libb.so does indeed appear to depend on liba.so (liba.so.0)?

-Ossama
-- 
Ossama Othman <address@hidden>
Distributed Object Computing Laboratory, Univ. of California at Irvine
1024D/F7A394A8 - 84ED AA0B 1203 99E4 1068  70E6 5EB7 5E71 F7A3 94A8