[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TODO
From: |
Scott James Remnant |
Subject: |
Re: TODO |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:00:34 +0000 |
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 11:15 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:02:55PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > Actually, I'd say the opposite is true ... the LONGER link line,
> > produced by the current Libtool, is what allows people to get away with
> > this because Libtool puts more stuff into the link line.
> >
> > A shorter, more concise, link line actually forces people to make sure
> > they *do* link anything they require themselves, rather than relying on
> > Libtool to do the right thing for them.
>
> but where does the problem show up? on !Linux, because Linux will
> "do the right thing".
>
No, on Linux ... because Linux does the right thing and causes the
applications to break; whereas Libtool does the wrong thing and links
the application directly with half the libraries on the system.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: TODO, (continued)
- Re: TODO, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Jacob Meuser, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Jacob Meuser, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Scott James Remnant, 2004/11/16
- Re: TODO, Jacob Meuser, 2004/11/16
- Re: TODO,
Scott James Remnant <=
- Re: TODO, Jacob Meuser, 2004/11/16
- Re: TODO, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/17
- Re: TODO, Jacob Meuser, 2004/11/17
- Re: TODO, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/16
- Re: TODO, Joe Orton, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Scott James Remnant, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Daniel Reed, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Jacob Meuser, 2004/11/14