[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug in libtoolize

From: Jeff Squyres
Subject: Re: Bug in libtoolize
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:13:10 -0500

I see that there was a patch committed on this, but I think it's not quite right, specifically in the area.

In the top-level, the following statement was added:

        cd libltdl && $(MAKE) local-install-files

However, there's no such target in libltdl/ (nor libltdl/Makefile). Was install-local-data meant, instead?

On Feb 21, 2005, at 10:55 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:

Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
I question that we can rely on tar being installed, although I have not
come across a system where it isn't.

Maybe I should add a --no-tar option to fallback to 'cp -p'
to cover that eventuality?

I take it back. GCS allows us to rely on a tar command being available.

Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,}
Research Scientist   ( '/
GNU Hacker           / )=
Technical Author   `(_~)_

{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]