[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD
From: |
Peter O'Gorman |
Subject: |
Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:43:11 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
|>
|> Hear! Hear!
|
|
| Blast. Seems I'm outvoted. To my mind there are good arguments for
| either case... but I'm not rabid about keeping branch-2-0 alive, so if
| the concensus is to drop the current branch-2-0 then so be it. Anyone
| else want to weigh in before anything is settled upon firmly?
While there are some "new" features in HEAD that are not in branch-2-0, I
don't believe them to be destabalizing. Ralf's speedups by themselves are,
in my opinion, worth the pain of dumping current branch-2-0 for HEAD.
The other new features include the testsuite, which has also proven its worth.
Sorry Gary, branch-2-0 was branched with a release in sight, "a couple of
weeks", but that was a very long time ago...
Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBQwxrX7iDAg3OZTLPAQK+hQP/cvrVOwY+4p3Fa8luqHNjOrRnWDXOwhPf
/Qm8lNCPegCa+7c8wlFK3Az6pQC3r9mT0wlG4UjFHaq1X804otW1TtdbPz1fjAuP
kP2WEZE/KruQ0pjU1G96LLMljDklSAljDUaEpoadK0Y+m8PKxNo/cwZ6E9fmo9Bl
dYatSzjUHNk=
=ZmfD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, (continued)
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Noah Misch, 2005/08/22
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Albert Chin, 2005/08/22
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/08/23
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Albert Chin, 2005/08/23
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/08/23
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Albert Chin, 2005/08/23
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/08/23
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/08/23
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/08/23
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD,
Peter O'Gorman <=
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/08/23