[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make -s
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: make -s |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:33:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hello Richard,
* Richard Hacker wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:39:31PM CET:
> On Thursday 10 January 2008 08:29, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > For whatever output is left done by libtool I expect that whoever want's
> > it silenced hard enough will have enough motivation to send a patch to
> > <address@hidden>.
> That shouldn't bee too difficult.
Misunderstanding again, this time my fault, sorry.
What I meant was: even with
make -s LIBTOOLFLAGS=--silent
there will be some leftover output done by libtool. If somebody wants
to fix that, be invited to provide a (complete) patch (best including
testsuite amend; the stresstest in Libtool HEAD would probably come in
handy).
If you want all tools silenced which are called by make, then I suggest
to simply use
make >/dev/null || make
Eric already mentioned the portability issue with your patch.
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
Ralf
- make -s, Bob Rossi, 2008/01/09
- Re: make -s, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/09
- Re: make -s, Mike Frysinger, 2008/01/09
- Re: make -s, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Richard Hacker, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: make -s, Mike Frysinger, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Bob Rossi, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Mike Frysinger, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Bob Rossi, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Richard Hacker, 2008/01/11
- Re: make -s, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/13
- Re: make -s, Richard Hacker, 2008/01/14