|Subject:||Re: Using Lighning instead of LLVM in Faust|
|Date:||Sat, 29 Feb 2020 10:50:28 -0300|
Hi Stéphane,Le sam., févr. 29, 2020 at 14:05, Stéphane Letz <address@hidden> a écrit :
Thanks.Reading the documentation I understand that Lightning is quite lower level (compared to MIR https://github.com/vnmakarov for instance) since the API directly deals with registers yes? So the API user has to so his own « register allocation/handling machinery »? There is no notion on an infinite set of variables that can be defined and used ?
That's correct. Lightning provides you with registers and it's up to you how to use them.
StéphaneLe 24 févr. 2020 à 16:30, Paul Cercueil <address@hidden> a écrit :Hi Stéphane,The current code would need some small changes to work without a MMU (does the ESP32 have one?) but for the rest Lightning does the job just fine.-PaulLe dim., févr. 23, 2020 at 13:34, Stéphane Letz <address@hidden> a écrit :Hi,I'm a investigating the use of Lighning instead of the already implemented LLVM code for the Faust compiler (http://faust.grame.fr) We have a class that translates an intermediate code in LLVM here: https://github.com/grame-cncm/faust/blob/master-dev/compiler/generator/interpreter/fbc_llvm_compiler.hh. I would like to test Lighning instead. The goal is to have a simple JIT chain (even if slower compared to LLVM), simpler to deploy on OS like Android, possibly embedded devices like the Bela board (https://bela.io), ESP32 (https://esp32.com), Teensy (https://www.pjrc.com/teensy/). Is is a reasonable expectation in terms of what is currently possible and implemented in Lighning?Thanks.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|