[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2522 in lilypond: duration*0 considered harmfu

From: lilypond
Subject: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2522 in lilypond: duration*0 considered harmful
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 17:29:47 +0000

Comment #5 on issue 2522 by address@hidden: duration*0 considered harmful

Ok, in the \footnote issue 2505 there is an example with a breath mark. That looks something like
\breath c4\footnote #'BreathMark ...
for getting a footnote to the breathmark.  Ugh.  This could be done with
\breath <>\footnote #'BreathMark ...
but it would also be feasible to make a function taking _one_ postevent like
post = #(define-music-function (parser location ev) (post-event?) #{ <>$ev #})
and say \breath \post\footnote #'...

In contrast to <>, it would only accept a single postevent. And I can't think of a really good macro name. \now\footnote does not convey the problem that there is only one postevent acceptable.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]