Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2870 in lilypond: \single \no and \hide needs user-level documentation and examples

[lilypond]

Comment #2 on issue 2870 by address@hidden: \single \no and \hide needs  
user-level documentation and examples
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2870

Thanks for working on this!

git grep "#'stencil \(= \)\?##f"

delivers a _lot_ of material to start with \no.  However, some overrides  
are of the \override Staff.TimeSignature ... form, and \no does not _yet_  
accept x.y grob specifications with an explicit context given (I expect to  
haul that one in in about one week).  So this needs to become either \new  
Staff \with { \no TimeSignature } { ... } or has to bank on \no  
Staff.TimeSignature being ready once the documentation is ready.