Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 660 in lilypond: ossia staff doesn't stop at correct horizontal position

[lilypond]

Comment #13 on issue 660 by address@hidden: ossia staff doesn't stop at  
correct horizontal position
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=660

Ok, there are 2 things I find myself wondering about with regard to this  
issue.

Number 1 is: with the latest addition, there is no common code path between  
to-barline for normal spanners and to-barline for StaffSymbol.  They still  
serve the same purpose.  Should the common name be retained or a new one  
coined.

Number 2 is: they don't actually serve the same purpose in all regards.   
The standard to-barline is only concerned about bar lines, while _this_  
to-barline is actually concerned about prefatory matter.  But _should_ they  
be about the same issue?

Here is an example where to-barline seems to be less than satisfactory  
exactly because it only works at bar lines:
{
  b1\< | \key fis\major b1\! | b2\< \key c\major b2\! |
}

Attachments:
        gaga.preview.png  5.7 KB

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings