[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] Ticket 794 dis

From: Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues
Subject: [Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] Ticket 794 discussion
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:10:26 +0000

I can confirm the bug oon version 2.19.48. The workaround still works fine.

[issues:#794] Arrow head upsets short arpeggios

Status: Accepted
Created: Tue Jul 14, 2009 08:27 AM UTC by Anonymous
Last Updated: Tue Jul 14, 2009 08:27 AM UTC
Owner: nobody

Originally created by: *anonymous

Originally created by: v.villenave
Originally owned by: v.villenave

% New report from Robin Bannister:

% Although short arpeggios are generally correctly printed, when an arrow
% is specified it upsets the arpeggio's placement.

% It looks like ly:arpeggio::print is careless at     heads[dir] -=

\version "2.12.1" %reproduced with 2.13.3

workaround = \override Arpeggio #'positions =
#(lambda (grob) (interval-widen (ly:arpeggio::calc-positions grob) 0.5))

\override Arpeggio #'arpeggio-direction = #DOWN
<c' g'>4 \arpeggio <c' f'>4 \arpeggio
% \workaround
<c' e'>4 \arpeggio <c' d'>4 \arpeggio % arrow too long for one wiggle

Sent from because address@hidden is subscribed to

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites,!
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]