[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #5450 relocate

From: Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues via Testlilyissues-auto
Subject: [Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] #5450 Introduce new command `set?'.
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 12:05:57 -0000

Needs more tidying up (see Rietveld)

Perhaps a misunderstanding: My Rietveld comment #6 was a response to David, it is not related to the patch itself, which is OK and ready to push. I will prepare a follow-up patch.

[issues:#5450] Introduce new command `set?'.

Status: Started
Created: Fri Dec 21, 2018 04:55 PM UTC by Werner LEMBERG
Last Updated: Mon Dec 24, 2018 10:26 AM UTC
Owner: Werner LEMBERG Introduce new command set?.

Contrary to set, set? won't override environment variables that are
already set.

We need this for reproducable builds, in particular with gub: The standard
fontconfig setup includes font files like ~/.fonts or /usr/share, which
obviously must not be used. Up to now, the fontconfig.reloc file in gub
uses the set relocation command, which doesn't allow gub to replace the
fontconfig configuration file with a temporary alternative while building
test files or documentation. Future changes in gub will use set? instead.

Sent from because address@hidden is subscribed to

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.

Testlilyissues-auto mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]