[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
address@hidden: Re: Piano pedalling patch]
From: |
Chris Jackson |
Subject: |
address@hidden: Re: Piano pedalling patch] |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 23:48:52 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
<oops - resending to the list..>
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 12:01:31AM +0100, Rune Zedeler wrote:
> Some comments, though:
> - when doing a up-down-tick, the two diagonal lines line up to each
> other instead of overlapping. The result is
>
> X X
> XXXXXX
> XXX XXX
> XXX XXX
> XXXXX XXXXX
> XXXX XXXX
That's odd. I seem to remember finding this problem once and fixing it.
Do they look like that on all inputs? They overlap on all the inputs
I've tested it on.
> - how do you do a Ped____|Ped__| without destroying the spacing? I
> would prefer to define a sustainUpDown for the wedgde and let \sutainUp
> \sustainDown do the above instead.
Hmm. That would need to be added as a new style option, I suppose.
> - and generally how do you state that pedal mark should last to the end
> of note (not to start of next note)?
I decided to make them end at the start of notes, to be consistent with
the existing code for Ped. *. I also had trouble coding the length of
the line so that it lasted to the end of the note and no further.
Now I think of it, they do mean musically different things - i.e.
for
b c d
_____|
you would have a smooth phrase, but without the c and d blending.
but for
b c d
_______|
the sound of the b and c would blend with the d .
That'll have to be a todo for the 'shorten' code in
setup_sustain_pedal().
--
chris
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- address@hidden: Re: Piano pedalling patch],
Chris Jackson <=