[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] ledger lines

From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ledger lines
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 01:42:28 +0100

address@hidden writes:
> >
> > yes -- but I could not find a direction for the whole, grob, so the
> > stem- prefix looks superfluous.
> >
> Mmh, well, yes.  The porrectus itself just has no direction.

the probem is that we get a confusing tangle of properties if we
give them exact names. We'd get 20 different sorts of directions. I
think it is better to reduce the number of variable names.

> > The patch looks good. I'm putting it in.
> Thanks.  Actually, I already feared that it still would be (at least
> partially) rejected, since it still does not solve all problems...

.. I forgot the exact reason why I rejected  the last one, but this
one looks as if it will improve the general state of lily, so that's
not too bad.


Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden    |

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]