Re: reading properties

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> \recurse ..." which would scan down through the children and perform the 
> change 
> all the way down (of course only on the children having "local copies" 
> already).
> Perhaps we could just change the "set" and "override" commands instead of 
> making new commands - so that

We could do that---assuming that we could get an efficient, consistent
implementation that does not waste memory (doesn't seem trivial)---but
who needs all this complicated semantics?

-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden    | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/