Re: i18n 2nd time

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:

> Well, correction: "I use". I suggest we don't fix this until a GCC is
> released that really removes the feature.

Or maybe until someone wants to create a translation of the manual.
In any case, I would suggest to use multiline strings only for
'docstrings'.

> I find easily editable docstrings more important adhering than some
> stupid standard which isn't really enforced yet.

It's already being 'enforced' by xgettext, in that you can't localise
those strings.  Can't/shouldn't we think of a smart preprocessor hack,
or an emacs c-mode hack.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org