[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: patch; scm/music-types.scm

From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: patch; scm/music-types.scm
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:51:12 +0200

address@hidden writes:
> > 2. To top that it would be nice to have syntax descriptions for all music
> > things (just how it is entered, not so much how to use it, that's a
> > job for a user manual), so that we always have a generated "reference
> > manual" for the input syntax.
> Gulp.  Maybe I should have stuck to the user manual.

Don't worry, you'll be fine. At worst you'll some more about how lily
works from the inside :-)

> I was wondering about that... _can_ I reference specific parts
> of the user manual from scm/music-types?  So far I've just
> said "see user manual", but having a link (in the html version)
> would be nicer.

I've added @usermanref{} and @glossaryref{} (the latter needs revision
since the glossary doesn't use nodes, but the file will compile)


Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   | 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]