[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ancient baritone clef?

From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: Ancient baritone clef?
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:54:14 +0200

address@hidden writes:
> Well, this could be easily done by just adding the line
>         ("mensural_f3" . ("clefs-mensural_f" 0 0))
> to supported-clefs in scm/clef.scm (untested).  However, this list is
> already quite longish, and I do not know if it makes sense to add an entry
> for each and every clef that can be found somewhere in literature, since
> there are so many possible combinations.  And for rarely used cases that

Indeed. The reason for having different clef properties is to allow
many combinations to be formed without adding endless lists of clef

> > Is there documentation somewhere for how to guess the
> > numbers on the first try instead of the third or fourth?

Yes. See lilypond-internals.

> \property Staff.clefPosition = #0:

I c&p'd your description into the internal doco. Thanks!

Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   | 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]