Re: Feature request: independent upper and lower staff markings

[Heikki Johannes Junes]

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

> address@hidden writes:
>
> > So, why not double the number of markings, by matching, for example, ^(
> > with ^) and _( with _), while for -( -) there would be attached a flag
> > which attaches it to the "upper" or "lower" marking group. This could be a
>
> because it is inconsistent: _ and ^ are only used for layout
> overrides, not to change musical meaning.

I agree. But, what about ^\startGroup ... ^\endGroup? Those analyse
brackets are not music and they should be free from musical context.
This was the original idea: the lack of control in analysis brackets.

Greetings,

  Heikki Junes