[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
file extensions
|
From: |
Rune Zedeler |
|
Subject: |
file extensions |
|
Date: |
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:34:46 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 |
Wouldn't it be a good idea, before 2.0 to change the file extension
convensions so that you could distinguish files to be compiled from
files to be included?
It would be nice to be able to do something like "lilypond *.ly" without
getting errors about include-files.
(.lyi would be a natural extension, but I am open for suggestions)
-Rune
- file extensions,
Rune Zedeler <=
Re: file extensions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2003/09/15