[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: file extensions

From: Rune Zedeler
Subject: Re: file extensions
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 23:30:45 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

Graham Percival wrote:

The problem is that, AFAIK, there is no difference in the file format
between include-files and non-include files.  (apart from the lack
of a \score{} section in include files)

I don't see why that is a "problem".
You could argue the same with .c and .h files or with .ps and .eps files.

It would be nice to be able to do something like "lilypond *.ly" without
getting errors about include-files.

You can already do this with files names:

Yeah, but that only works with your own files because we have no naming
I think it would be much cleaner to specify the file status with the
file extension.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]