[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Where should I send doc patches?

From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Subject: Re: Where should I send doc patches?
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 10:47:56 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)

Graham Percival writes:

> I think I've got my life organized enough to start sending in doc
> patches again; sorry for the gap.  Should I track 2.0.x or 2.1.y?

Good to have you back at it!  I would suggest that anything beyond a
necessary fix should go in 2.1.  If someone feels the need and has the
time to backport non-critical stuff that's not experimental to 2.0,
that's ok.

> In most cases the documentation fixes will benefit current 2.0
> users, but if I make changes to 2.0, will they get lost when 2.1
> becomes 2.2?  Should doc patches be applied to both branches?

No, all real work should always go in 2.1, 2.0 is an option.


Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter       |

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]