[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond 2.0.1 built ok for FreeBSD 4.0 w/gcc 2.95.2
From: |
R. D. Davis |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond 2.0.1 built ok for FreeBSD 4.0 w/gcc 2.95.2 |
Date: |
20 Nov 2003 02:22:15 -0500 |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:22:15 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.24i |
Quothe R. D. Davis, from writings of Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:59:56PM -0500:
> Has anyone else run into this problem with ImageMagick?
Yes, I know that replying to one's own message isn't considered a good
thing. :-) ...however, in case anyone else has any problem installing
ImageMagick in order to get Lilypond working, after a little
experimenting, I figured out how to get ImageMagick's configure to
succeed (part of the battle won):
./configure --with-lzh --enable-delegate-build --with-png --with-jpeg
CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/libpng"
LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib"
Configure appeared to go ok, then, running make appeared to succeed.
Running display, however, failed, with a segmentation fault and core
dump. Upon running make check, a window popped up on the screen
congratulating me for being able to display an image, but then, the
test results came back showing that 3 out of 33 tests failed, and
11 out of 334 subtests failed.
t/fpx/read: dubious - generated a core
t/fpx/write: dubious - generated a core
t/ttf/read: NOK & FAILED (image opacity differs)
Any thoughts on this?
--
Copyright (C) 2003 R. D. Davis The difference between humans & other animals:
All Rights Reserved an unnatural belief that we're above Nature &
address@hidden 410-744-4900 her other creatures, using dogma to justify such
http://www.rddavis.org beliefs and to justify much human cruelty.