[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:17:10 +0100
> I had a cold sweat when running the new 2.1.26, but then read:
> "The naming of exported Scheme functions now follows Scheme conventions."
> This is just a suggestion:
> It may be more idiomatic to define a setter for accessors. For
> instance, given the reader ly:music-property and the writer
> (define-public ly:music-property
> (make-procedure-with-setter ly:music-property
> you can then use ly:music-property to access the property as before,
> but you can also use it with set!:
Can I ask for a patch?
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- scheme accessors, Nicolas Sceaux, 2004/02/24
- scheme accessors,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=