[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: double info docs and fonts

From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: double info docs and fonts
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:57:57 +0100

address@hidden writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
> > address@hidden writes:
> > 
> >> now we have a conventional (out/*, image alt only) and www
> >> (out-www/*, image src present) Info documentation.  Should
> >> the files of the latter override those of the former when
> >> installed?
> >
> > Yes. If possible - the idea is that the lilypond package
> > has the info files without .png, and lilypond-doc has the
> > PNGs for those info files.
> And the replacement info files which reference those PNGs, I
> guess.

No, our idea was to have the info files that reference the PNGs be
distributed with the base package.

(or I'm mistaken. Jan?)

> >> Analogously, we also have *.pfa fonts in mf/out and
> >> mf/out-www, which are mostly the same.  What's the role
> >> of this?
> >
> > That's strange, out-www/ shouldn't contain pfa files. Can you
> > investigate how they ended up there?
> To be honest I'm pretty much lost with the stepmake build
> system.  I will try my best, but some guidance would be most
> welcome.

Just redirect the output of the build process into a log file, and see
where it says out-www/*.pfa


 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   | 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]