[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond ./ChangeLog Documentation/user/lilypon...
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond ./ChangeLog Documentation/user/lilypon... |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Nov 2004 00:16:32 +0100 (CET) |
> > + . To get consistent indentation in the DVI output it is better
> > + to avoid the @verbatim environment. Use the @example
> > + environment instead if possible, but without extraneous
> > + indentation. [...]
>
> can you elaborate? What's inconsistent about verbatim vs. example?
See below and the attached PDF file.
Werner
======================================================================
\input texinfo
@setfilename example-verbatim
@node example vs. verbatim,,(dir),(dir)
@chapter @code{@@example} vs.@: @code{@@verbatim} environment
Here we compare the indentation of the @code{@@example} and the
@code{@@verbatim} environment. The latter is indented while the
former isn't, as can be seen in the examples below.
First, a @code{@@verbatim} environment:
@verbatim
This is
a @verbatim environment.
@end verbatim
Now, the @code{@@example} environment:
@example
This is
an @@example environment.
@end example
For consistent appearance, the @code{@@example} environment should be
used if possible. If @code{@@verbatim} is unavoidable, surround it
with a @code{@@quotation} environment to get the proper indentation:
@quotation
@verbatim
This is
a @verbatim environment.
@end verbatim
@end quotation
@bye
example-verbatim.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document