[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FretDiagrams Architecture
From: |
Giancarlo Niccolai |
Subject: |
Re: FretDiagrams Architecture |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:04:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
Alle 04:17, domenica 21 novembre 2004, Carl Sorensen ha scritto:
> On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 07:38, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > * Although it is possible to make a #(set-fret-diagram-string ) , I
> > think we can use the mechanism now used for chord exceptions, ie.
> >
> > * I suppose that this is still too difficult for "normal" users, and
> > that we should also have an option
> >
> > a. to override fret diagrams for once, eg.
> >
> mychords = \chordmode { d d,}
>
> <<
> \ChordNames {\mychords}
> \FretDiagrams {\mychords}
>
>
> will produce two chord labels (both D), and two FretDiagrams (which will
> be different items from the hash table). I think this feature could be
> convenient for those who may prefer to have multiple fret diagrams for a
> chord in a piece.
>
> What do you think?
>
Makes sense; also because the freet diagram line and the chord name line ARE
two different contexts; I.e. you expect to have both "D" name and the diagram
on two different invisible logical staffs.
Bests,
Giancarlo Niccolai
- FretDiagrams Architecture, Carl Sorensen, 2004/11/14
- FretDiagrams Architecture, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/11/19
- Re: FretDiagrams Architecture, Carl Sorensen, 2004/11/20
- Re: FretDiagrams Architecture, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/11/21
- Re: FretDiagrams Architecture, Carl Sorensen, 2004/11/21
- Re: FretDiagrams Architecture, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/11/21
Re: FretDiagrams Architecture, Carl Sorensen, 2004/11/24