[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0 |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:23:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Bertalan Fodor writes:
> I forgot to ask. Should I rebuild lily with the new tetex, before
> reporting the errors? Or should they disappear without rebuilding
> lily?
What errors?
We should devise an upgrade path. Best would be
1. upload lilypond with all tetex-3.0 fixes, built against tetex-2.0
2. upload tetex
3. upload lilypond, built against tetex-3.0
If we skip 1., anything that goes wrong in synchronising 2 and 3 will
break lilypond.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, (continued)
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/09
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/09
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/09
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/10
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/10
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/10
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/10
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/10
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/02/10
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/10
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/10
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/10
- Re: cygwin: lilypond and tetex-3.0, Bertalan Fodor, 2005/02/07