[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested

From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Subject: Re: lilypond & tetex-3.0 tested
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:18:45 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)

Bertalan Fodor writes:

> Trying to build 2.4CVS with tetex-2.0
> Almost everything works, but feta outline fonts are not found:

This is quite strange, as all tetex-3.0/2.0 changes should have
been compatibility features.

Can you try the usual path of finding out why this fails

  * check TEXMF
  * what file is not found (the, or the feta font)
  * check TEXMF
  * use kpsewhich to locate the file
  * check TEXMF
  * check if texmf.cnf is really the tetex-2.x one
  * check TEXMF
  * check if lilypond is linked against tetex-2.x (libkpathsea3)


The tex, map and font files are searched in different directory trees
for tetex-2.0 and tetex-3.0.  The intricacies can be found quite
easily by looking at texmf.cnf, and playing with kpsewich.

> Invoking `dvips -Ppdf -E -o 
> lily-1009715145.ep
> s lily-1009715145'This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye
> Software (ww
> ' TeX output 2005.02.15:1340' -> lily-1009715145.eps
> kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000
> --dpi 8000
> feta20
> mktexpk: Mismatched mode ljfour and resolution 8000; ignoring mode.
> mktexpk: Can't guess mode for 8000 dpi devices.
> mktexpk: Use a config file, or update me.
> kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log.
> dvips: Font feta20 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead.
> dvips: Such scaling will generate extremely poor output.

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter       |

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]