[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: urg.

From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: urg.
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 14:22:24 +0100

address@hidden writes:
> > I'm certain we can produce the PDF backend. It's just that I thought
> > it would be a convenient way to deal with TTF fonts.
> Why do you think that TTFs are easier to handle than the OTFs we

Because in PDF, TTF can simply be inserted "as is", by copy & pasting
the font. 

> > Oh, of course I forgot another option: we can construct a Type42
> > font ourselves.
> I discourage that.  You loose flexibility.  OTFs are much more
> compact.

I guess we have a  difference of opinion. I'll have a look over the
next weeks which option is the easiest to realize. 


 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   | 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]