[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 14:22:24 +0100
> > I'm certain we can produce the PDF backend. It's just that I thought
> > it would be a convenient way to deal with TTF fonts.
> Why do you think that TTFs are easier to handle than the OTFs we
Because in PDF, TTF can simply be inserted "as is", by copy & pasting
> > Oh, of course I forgot another option: we can construct a Type42
> > font ourselves.
> I discourage that. You loose flexibility. OTFs are much more
I guess we have a difference of opinion. I'll have a look over the
next weeks which option is the easiest to realize.
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Re: urg., Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/02/19
- urg., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/02/18
- Re: urg., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/02/19
- Re: urg., Werner LEMBERG, 2005/02/19
- Re: urg.,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: urg., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/02/20