|
From: | Brynne and Russ Jorgensen |
Subject: | Re: Several problems with 2.5.27 version on Windows ME |
Date: | Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:09:35 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 |
Strange, the -devel list should not strip attachments.
I originally didn't look closely. Now that I investigate, it looks like it was the comcast.net mail server that blocked outgoing email with .bat attachments saying "unsafe windows attachment - resend as TAR or GZ".
I'm not sure I understand, it seems that the test is for operating system flavour, not for unicode functionality
Yes, that is right. I was thinking along the lines of minimizing the amount of "extra" stuff that a user would need to install to use lilypad. Since Win 9x/ME will probably go the way of the dinosaur in the next couple of years, just wasn't sure it was worth the extra complication. Maybe not a good decision... Sorry if I'm showing a US-centric bias.
I thought that you said the unicode version of lilypad would work when the user installs compatibitily libraries? Did I misunderstand?
Actually, you need to link the unicode version of lilypad against a special library that then detects if the compatibility libraries are necessary, and if so, if they're installed. My modifications for a non-unicode version of lilypad didn't include how to link against said library.
-Russ
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |