[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:18:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.1 |
On Thursday 18 August 2005 03.18, Pedro Kröger wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
> > I wouldn't worry about that. I haven't been afraid of large
> > refactorings in the past (in fact, we have a very big one -- possibly
> > the biggest in the history of lily -- coming up).
>
> just curious, which one is that?
I think he refers to my master's thesis, which separates the input language
from the formatter, and cleans up a lot of code in the process. "coming up"
is maybe an overstatement - I have forked 2.6.0, and formally it's just a big
experiment. We don't know if it will get frontported.
--
Erik
- Page breaks, was: something else, (continued)
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Trevor Baca, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Johannes Schindelin, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Pedro Kröger, 2005/08/18
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration,
Erik Sandberg <=
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18