|
From: | Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: | Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration |
Date: | Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:04:00 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) |
[flup to lily-devel] Peter Teeson wrote:
I've been lurking here so I may have missed it. But anyway here is my question. WRT fast changing syntax - do we have, or is it feasible/possible to have, a formal grammar for the lily language?I.E. formal in the mathematical sense?Or are things still mutating so rapidly that we need some more Darwin time to allow stabilisation? The reason I ask is that it might help in the propsed re-factorisation aspect of it.
BNF grammars have been posted here. Please search the archives. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |