[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Debian lilypond
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: Debian lilypond |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:06:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.3 |
On Monday 24 October 2005 00.56, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Erik Sandberg <address@hidden> writes:
> > PNGs suffer from limited resolution. It's probably wiser to include .eps
> > or embedded .pdf files (perhaps pngs can be used as preview images, if
> > that's needed).
>
> Why? If I generate a png at full size, how do I lose? What am I
> missing?
If you print the document on a 1200 dpi printer, you must create 1200 dpi PNGs
to get full quality. I don't know what "full size" means in terms of dpi, but
if it means >=1200 dpi, then it should of course be ok for most users (though
the corresponding .eps might be a smaller file).
--
Erik
Re: Debian lilypond, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/24