[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (doc help) quick check on C++ vs. scheme
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: (doc help) quick check on C++ vs. scheme |
Date: |
Thu, 11 May 2006 15:59:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:22, Graham Percival wrote:
> From 11.1.2 Internal music representation
> ----
> C++ object: Each music object is represented by a C++ object. For
> technical reasons, different music objects may be represented by
> different C++ object types. For example, a note is Event object, while
> \grace creates a Grace_music object.
>
> We expect that distinctions between different C++ types will disappear
> in the future.
> ----
>
> IIRC, a few years ago we replaced a bunch of C++ things with scheme. I
> also doubt that anybody's looked at this chapter in the past few years.
> Is this data still correct?
No, there's only one Music class now (it changed somewhere in 2.7.x).
--
Erik