lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (doc help) quick check on C++ vs. scheme


From: Erik Sandberg
Subject: Re: (doc help) quick check on C++ vs. scheme
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:59:52 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1

On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:22, Graham Percival wrote:
>  From 11.1.2 Internal music representation
> ----
> C++ object: Each music object is represented by a C++ object. For
> technical reasons, different music objects may be represented by
> different C++ object types. For example, a note is Event object, while
> \grace creates a Grace_music object.
>
> We expect that distinctions between different C++ types will disappear
> in the future.
> ----
>
> IIRC, a few years ago we replaced a bunch of C++ things with scheme.  I
> also doubt that anybody's looked at this chapter in the past few years.
>   Is this data still correct?

No, there's only one Music class now (it changed somewhere in 2.7.x).

-- 
Erik




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]