[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Updated stream/parser todo
|
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Updated stream/parser todo |
|
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:36:28 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>> Not necessarily; the unclean workarounds are temporary and isolated,
>> and will only last until we decide to drop backward compatibility.
>
> I don't see the point of temporary workarounds: either we solve a
> problem completely or we don't. There's nothing as long-lasting as a
> temporary workaround.
What backward compatibility do we want to retain, and for how long?
If the end result is a cleanup, and all ugliness is inside #ifdef
REMOVE_BY_2_9_0, that might be acceptible?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- Updated stream/parser todo, Erik Sandberg, 2006/06/14
- Re: Updated stream/parser todo, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/06/16
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Updated stream/parser todo, Erik Sandberg, 2006/06/19
- Re: Updated stream/parser todo, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/06/19
- Re: Updated stream/parser todo,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Message not available
- Re: Updated stream/parser todo, Erik Sandberg, 2006/06/27
- Re: Updated stream/parser todo, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/06/27
- Re: Updated stream/parser todo, Erik Sandberg, 2006/06/27
- Re: Updated stream/parser todo, Nicolas Sceaux, 2006/06/28