[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug or Feature?
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: Bug or Feature? |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:26:43 +1000 |
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 16:36 +0200, Marco Gusy wrote:
> Alle 21:02, mercoledì 19 luglio 2006, hai scritto:
> > Please read the section on "Automatic accidentals" in the manual.
> >
> > /Mats
>
> "modern
> This rule corresponds to the common practice in the 20th century. This rule
> prints the same accidentals as default, but temporary accidentals also are
> canceled in other octaves.
I may be reading the documentation wrong, but to me this suggests that
there _should_ be a natural on the high C (as Marco says). Are the docs
wrong, is the implementation wrong or am I reading it wrong?
- Bug or Feature?, Marco Gusy, 2006/07/12
- Re: Bug or Feature?, Marco Gusy, 2006/07/13
- Re: Bug or Feature?, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/07/19
- Re: Bug or Feature?, Marco Gusy, 2006/07/25
- Re: No Bug nor Feature?, Donald Axel, 2006/07/25
- Re: No Bug nor Feature?, Marco Gusy, 2006/07/26
- List-culture [was] No Bug nor Feature?, Donald Axel, 2006/07/26
- Re: List-culture [was] No Bug nor Feature?, Marco Gusy, 2006/07/27
- Modern-acc. bug when partial bar first, Donald Axel, 2006/07/27
- Bugreport: Accidental Modern bug when partial bar first, Donald Axel, 2006/07/30
- Re: Bug or Feature?,
Joe Neeman <=