[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pure simple-closures

From: Joe Neeman
Subject: Re: pure simple-closures
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:44:59 +0200

On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 17:29 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Joe Neeman schreef:
> > On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 12:15 +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >> Joe Neeman schreef:
> >>
> >>> Mostly because at the time that I wrote it, I couldn't figure out how to
> >>> handle arbitrary length argument lists in scheme (the only way I
> >>> currently know is to build the list of arguments, cons in the function
> >> I think you're looking for the apply function,
> >>
> >>    (apply func arg-list)
> > 
> > Ah yes, that's much better. So did you want me to put call_pure_function
> > in scheme?
> yes, I think so. The most important thing is that subsystems should not 
> cross the C++/Scheme divide all too often. Since most of the func->pure 
>   -func code is in Scheme, I think it's best we keep improvements there.

How's this one? I also changed from using SCM_UNDEFINED to
SCM_UNSPECIFIED so I could restore and added

Attachment: tmp.patch
Description: Text Data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]