Re: dynamics and accidentals

[Graham Percival]

Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> I think that the current code which handles collisions between
> accidentals and dynamics is `too good'.  Have a look at this example:
...
> IMHO, you either need a perfect skyline algorithm with quite exact
> boundaries so that such unnatural big distances are avoided, or, which
> is perhaps sufficient, just ignore accidentals for positioning
> articulation signs below or above note heads.

If we ignore articulations, we occasionally have collisions between 
accidentals on notes below the staff and longer dynamics (like mp or 
mf).  I'd rather have the current extra space then collisions in default 
output.

Cheers,
- Graham